

By Shawn Cole, President & Founder — Shawn Cole is a nationally recognized authority on CEO recruiting. His insights regularly appear in Forbes, Bloomberg, The Wall Street Journal, Harvard Business Review, Fast Company, Entrepreneur, and other leading publications, delivering nuanced and critical analysis on executive recruitment, succession planning, enterprise transformation, and the evolving demands of modern C-suites.
Sophomore year always hits harder than freshman year. The novelty wears off, routines set in, and what once felt like a new adventure becomes a lackluster day-to-day lifestyle.
CEO tenure follows this pattern with brutal precision. Year one delivers quick wins and bold decisions that make everything seem possible. The board loves you, employees buy into your vision, and markets respond positively to your leadership approach.
Then year two arrives. In many cases, your easy victories become much more difficult to obtain as complex problems surface from every direction. Your team may even start questioning initiatives that seemed brilliant just six months ago.
This creates a choice point that separates average CEOs from exceptional ones. You can coast through the difficulty, or you can use it as fuel for your most transformative period.
Early CEO wins create dangerous overconfidence that can destroy decision-making effectiveness. You start believing that initial successes reflect pure leadership genius rather than favorable timing or obvious fixes that any competent executive would have made.
Those first victories usually come from low-hanging fruit. For example, cutting waste everyone knew needed cutting, making delayed decisions, and executing plans already in development. These feel like major accomplishments, but they require minimal creativity or risk.
Real challenges emerge when obvious solutions disappear entirely. Organizations adapt to your leadership style while markets adjust to your positioning and teams figure out your predictable patterns. What felt revolutionary six months ago becomes standard operating procedure.
The temptation to repeat early strategies becomes overwhelming when genuinely new problems emerge. You will likely want to apply the same playbook that worked before, even when circumstances have shifted completely. This comfort-seeking behavior turns once forward-looking leaders into predictable ones who lose sight of sustained success as conditions change.
Ultimately, leaders must remember that market dynamics never stop evolving, customer expectations are always shifting, and technology will continue to advance at breakneck speed. Constant competition and changing baselines create the need for constant innovation rather than comfortable repetition.
The following are four strategies to help take the slump of sophomore year and turn it into sustained success.
Stop optimizing existing approaches and start discovering new growth opportunities.
The S-curve concept explains CEO performance patterns perfectly. Initial success comes from climbing your first curve, but sustained excellence requires jumping to new curves before the current one peaks.
Adobe’s transformation under Shantanu Narayen demonstrates this approach. When subscription models threatened traditional software sales, Adobe could have optimized its existing business model by improving pricing and features for perpetual licenses in a quick fix that would have temporarily appeased stakeholders. Instead, Narayen abandoned their proven approach entirely. He moved to cloud subscriptions despite customer resistance and significant revenue disruption.
The transition nearly destroyed Adobe’s stock price in the short term, with customers complaining loudly while analysts questioned the strategy and internal teams worried about revenue stability. Narayen continued anyway. He recognized that the old model had reached its natural limit, and Adobe’s subscription business now generates more predictable revenue and higher valuations than its previous model ever achieved.
Similarly, forward-looking leaders can take this idea in stride and run “future-back” workshops where you imagine your industry five years ahead, then work backward to identify disruptions that could reshape competitive dynamics. Ask what would make your current business model obsolete, then figure out how to implement those changes before competitors do.
Headquarters environments create information bubbles that distort your understanding of market realities. The higher you climb in leadership, the more filtered your information becomes, creating blind spots that can destroy entire strategies.
Galderma’s Flemming Ornskov regularly spent time with competitors and clients, not just friendly customers who praised the company. He sought out lost customers, frustrated prospects, and rival executives who provided unfiltered perspectives on market conditions.
This curiosity revealed opportunities that internal teams consistently missed. Ornskov discovered unmet customer needs, identified costly process inefficiencies, and spotted emerging trends before they appeared in formal market research.
Outside perspectives prevent the cultural nearsightedness that destroys organizational effectiveness. When leadership teams only talk to each other, they create echo chambers that amplify minor problems while missing major opportunities.
Fortunately, you can combat these errors by conducting pre-mortems for major initiatives. Start by imagining they failed completely, then work backward to identify any further potential failure points. Additionally, take time to interview customers who chose competitors, attend conferences outside your sector, and spend time with frontline employees who interact with markets daily.
Treat leadership development like portfolio management by investing early in high-potential people while rotating team members to prevent stagnation. Most CEOs focus on immediate talent needs rather than building leadership pipelines that can drive innovation beyond their tenure.
IBM’s Arvind Krishna transformed the company partly by refreshing leadership teams across divisions, bringing external perspectives while developing internal talent for expanded roles. He didn’t wait for natural turnover or performance problems to create change. Instead, he proactively moved high performers into challenging assignments that accelerated their development while bringing fresh thinking to established teams.
This prevented the kind of leadership stagnation that kills innovation in many organizations. When identical people tackle identical problems using identical approaches, breakthrough thinking becomes impossible. Regular rotation and development create cross-pollination of ideas that prevents organizational stagnation. When the same people tackle identical problems using identical approaches, breakthrough thinking becomes impossible.
Krishna invested heavily in identifying potential successors throughout IBM, not just for his own role but for every critical position across the organization. Deep leadership bench strength emerged while high-potential employees gained clear advancement paths that dramatically improved retention.
Similarly, your leadership pipeline needs portfolio management thinking. Identify high-potential people who could assume greater responsibilities within two years, then create assignments that develop these leaders while solving real business challenges. Rotate successful team members into different functions. Broaden their perspectives deliberately.
The ego satisfaction from early CEO wins can become dangerously addictive and ultimately lead to decisions that prioritize personal glory over company health. As such, it’s essential to focus on organizational success rather than personal recognition.
S&P Global’s Douglas Peterson consistently chose to strengthen the organization even when it didn’t enhance his personal profile, investing heavily in long-term technology infrastructure that wouldn’t pay off during his tenure while developing employees who eventually took senior roles at competing companies. He supported initiatives that other executives would receive credit for implementing.
Peterson understood that sustainable CEO success comes from building organizations that thrive without individual leaders. He created systems, developed people systematically, and successfully established cultures that would generate results long after his departure.
Teams work harder for leaders they trust to make decisions based on collective benefit rather than personal advancement. This servant leadership approach greatly enhanced Peterson’s reputation and effectiveness because employees and stakeholders recognized his genuine commitment to organizational success.
To find similar results, start by seeking out truth-tellers who will challenge your thinking. Make at least one major decision each quarter that benefits the organization without enhancing your personal profile. Finally, invest in initiatives that will generate results for your successor rather than immediate wins for yourself.
The sophomore slump isn’t inevitable. It’s a choice point that separates CEOs who coast from those who accelerate into their most impactful period.
The transition from first to sophomore year requires embracing discomfort as a growth signal rather than a problem to avoid. Yet, the challenges that make year two difficult also create opportunities for breakthrough thinking and transformational change that comfortable leaders never discover.
Curiosity becomes your most powerful tool during this period. It’s important to stay genuinely interested in learning, questioning assumptions, and exploring possibilities that success might have made you overlook. Similarly important is adopting humility about what you don’t know, which ultimately opens pathways to insights that overconfidence blocks.
At Cowen Partners Executive Search, we help boards identify strategies and build executive teams that transform mid-tenure challenges into opportunities for growth. The leaders who thrive during these crucial periods understand that sustained success comes from continuous evolution rather than celebrating early victories.
Our hands-on CEO recruiters have experience working with private, public, pre-IPO, and non-profit organizations.
Clients are typically $50 million in revenue to Fortune 1000’s or have assets over a billion. Successful placements span the entire C-Suite – CEO, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and include vice president, general counsel, and other director-level leadership roles.
Through our proven retained executive search process, we find, vet, and deliver the top 1% of candidates for positions across the C-suite. Our process works for all industries, including technology, healthcare, manufacturing, retail, real estate, financial services, private equity, and more.
Learn how we deliver top talent, no matter the need, with our industry-leading research and resources. Discover the strategy behind so many glowing Cowen Partners’ reviews — and that’s made us a top retained executive search firm in New York, Chicago, Seattle, Atlanta, Dallas, Indianapolis, Los Angeles, and beyond.
Fill out the email request form to learn more about our approach.